Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

acoustic_rancid · Post by **acoustic_rancid** » Sat May 25, 2013 9:19 pm

Blasphemy! Would you say they should have made the carrolls into skytops?

mackiv · Post by **mackiv** » Sun May 26, 2013 6:26 pm

The Carroll's were/ARE raw by design.......THESE are not.... I'm aware it's supposed to be a retro thus altering the silhouette is irrelevant, but I seriously doubt anyone would even give a second look at these if not for the supreme logo.....And of course when I said "they should have made me midtops" I ment in order to appeal to me...lol

And for the record MCs as a skytop wouldn't look too far off of a pair of caballeros, and I'm fine with that! Lol!

acoustic_rancid · Post by **acoustic_rancid** » Sun May 26, 2013 8:00 pm

Just joshin'. I've always dug the early 90s vans and airwalks, so these play directly into what I dig. They're not flashy, but that's not really the point.
One of those "those who know, know" situations, only the main difference is that I'm actually in the know, for once.

Post by **akamedaniel** » Mon May 27, 2013 12:09 am

mackiv wrote:The Carroll's were/ARE raw by design.......THESE are not....

Probably why they stopped making these.
Nah but faux real, I gotta see these in person before I make any further judgements.

nurizat · Post by **nurizat** » Mon May 27, 2013 9:46 am

easy pass on this

ramoer · Post by **ramoer** » Mon May 27, 2013 1:58 pm

I had these shoes in Jr. high, I dont think ill be buying them again.

Post by **JesseC** » Mon May 27, 2013 4:17 pm

mackiv wrote:The Carroll's were/ARE raw by design.......THESE are not.... I'm aware it's supposed to be a retro thus altering the silhouette is irrelevant, but I seriously doubt anyone would even give a second look at these if not for the supreme logo.....And of course when I said "they should have made me midtops" I ment in order to appeal to me...lol

And for the record MCs as a skytop wouldn't look too far off of a pair of caballeros, and I'm fine with that! Lol!

FINALLY something from Supreme I can respect.

Mackiv, that's weird to me that you wear Vans for the flashy-ness.. Where I live, no one even recognizes my Vans. Always thought that was sort of a Nikehead thing..

I think the only reason this release should catch heat if because of the shape. Supreme insists On using rubber that has NO resemblence to the USA shape. I'm sure by now you're all sick of me ranting about that, but come on, here is where it really hurts the product. That round-ass toe looks dreadful.

mackiv · Post by **mackiv** » Mon May 27, 2013 8:47 pm

I wear J's for the hypebeasts, and vans mostly just for me. But as many of u know, when u have on a pair of flashier vans, or just legendary ones like ANY of the bones u get those compliments from random peoples. Fewer than an expensive pair of nikes, maybe...but when someone notices yur vans its probly cuz theyve NEVER seen that shoe b4, not because theyve had 4 retro releases to get used to em....lol

But back to these shoes: i still feel like there will be room for improvement once i see em on foot, but im not scared to say i might not even remember these...(ex. Supreme authentics(eras?) Checkered that showed up in outlet stores)

Post by **jacobmontana** » Tue May 28, 2013 1:29 pm

never liked this model

Post by **daewond3r** » Wed May 29, 2013 12:13 pm

Props to Supreme for getting a bit historic, but I'll pass as well. I'm a firm believer in buying only what you like/would wear and these just aren't doing it for me.

erwin · Post by **erwin** » Wed May 29, 2013 12:24 pm

daewond3r wrote:Props to Supreme for getting a bit historic, but I'll pass as well. I'm a firm believer in buying only what you like/would wear and these just aren't doing it for me.

Agree

Vandol · Post by **Vandol** » Wed May 29, 2013 2:23 pm

Mom shoes lol.

mackiv wrote:Gonna need to see em on feet b4 i can judge....they look just tooooo low top...shoulda made em mid tops instead

+1 on more pics the black and maroon pairs do look nice though

Drew. · Post by **Drew.** » Sat Jun 01, 2013 11:30 pm

I actually really like the monotone black pair.

-Drew

TreatnHerRight · Post by **TreatnHerRight** » Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:00 pm

My Attempt At Replicating the E-mail.

...............
06/10/2013
...............

Supreme/Vans

The Vans #86 Lampin was originally produced in the USA in 1993, introduced at the time as an updated durable skate shoe.

This Summer, Supreme will be releasing a new version of the Vans Lampin. The Lampin will feature a premium suede nubuck upper with a vulcanized waffle outsole and leather in-sole. The Lampin will be available in four colorways made exclusively for Supreme.

Available in-store in NY, LA, London and online on June 13th.

Available in Japan on June 15th.

Click Here for more information

SlipOnFiend · Post by **SlipOnFiend** » Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:18 pm

I really like the maroon/navy color combination, but god those things are ugly!

Under The Palms

Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

Re: Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)